The church has no “leadership” crisis
Listen to this article
WHEN I ENTERED the academic world recently, I noticed changes in Christian education I had not been aware of. I had not realized education had become so focused on leadership development. Across Canada’s Christian colleges there are now academic degrees in leadership, reams of Christian books written on leadership, and faculty whose sole role is to teach leadership development.
Photo by Jehyun Sung on Unsplash
We have not always taught “leadership development.” Peter Drucker, who died in 2005, was sometimes called “the founder of modern management.” He believed leadership could be researched, systematized, and taught—like, say, biology. He’s called the “founder” because in some sense this was new: neither Mother Teresa, Winston Churchill, Diedrich Bonhoeffer, Amy Carmichael, D. L. Moody, Abraham Lincoln, John Wesley, Menno Simons, Augustine, Paul, or Jesus ever took a course on “leadership.”
This does not mean their education didn’t prepare them for leadership. In medieval schools for example, students preparing to be clergy or civil rulers would have learned grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, astronomy, music, and geometry. Leaders needed to know these, but these were not courses on “leadership.”
John Wesley, the English revival leader, was an Anglican priest in the 18th century who wrote one of the most widely read books on medicine in England, Primitive Physick. He spent years at Oxford studying. Thus, when the Spirit poured out revival on all flesh in the Great Awakening, God had a well-formed Christian on hand to direct and shape this renewal for the benefit of the church. His education prepared him to lead, but little of it was “leadership development.”
It is often said that the church faces a “leadership” crisis. Who will lead our churches after the looming swell of burnouts and retirements? I often hear that the answer to this is to create more opportunities for “leadership development.” But never in history have we focused more on “leadership development” than in the recent generation. The solution will certainly involve education, it always has. But we don’t have this crisis because we have lacked “leadership development” in the last generation.
May I speak bluntly? The church does not need more “leaders”; the church needs more Christians. Christians who have first been baptized. Christians whose minds are being smelted down and forged to the shape of Scripture. Christians who are connecting creation, exodus, law, history, exile, worship, incarnation, atonement, Pentecost and sanctification in rich ways. Christians who are drinking deeply from the wells of the church’s historic tradition, who know something of the “cloud of witnesses” down through the ages. Christians who are undergoing a detox from idolatrous, pornographic, consumerist, violent and narcissistic poisons of the soul. Christians who are learning to practice the virtues—courage, prudence, temperance, humility, and justice. Christians who are baptized by the Holy Spirit, firing all this with a radiant love compelling the world to look, and follow.
When the church has educated Christians of this kind, the church will have leaders.
About “leadership development” then: Christians like this will benefit enormously from being taught “leadership.” Much has been learned in the last generation about the “science” of leadership. Especially when this involves coaching and apprenticeship under great leaders, “leadership development” is crucial. But it’s the easy part. The task that will take much more money and time than we think we can afford, will be educating people to be Christians.
